125.Bnmer J.S. On perceptual readiness // Psychol. Rev, 1957. Vol. 64, № 2.

126.Bnmer J.S., Minium A.L Perceptual identification and the perceptual organization //J. genet, Psychol, 1955. Vol. 55.

127.Brunswick E, Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkley — Los Angeles, 1956.

128.DashiellJ.K A neglected fourth dimension to psychological research // PsychoL Rev. 1940, Vol. 47.

129.Davis R.C The psychophysiology of set // Harriman (Ed.)-Twentieth-century psychology, N.Y., 1946.

130.English Я Д, English А, С Psychological and psychoanalytical terms, NT. 1958.

131.Erdalyi M.K A new look at the New Look: Perceptual defence and vigilance //Psychol, Rev. 1974. VoL 81. J4 1.

132.Fergus RM. Perception, The basic process in cognitive behavior. N.Y., 1966,

133.Fraisse A Le role des attitudes dans la perception // Les Attitudes, Paris, 196L

134.Freeman &Z, The problem of set //Amer. 1 PsychoL 1939. Vol. 52.

135.Freeman G.L. Discussion; «Central vs* periphericab locus of set: a critique of the Mowrer, Raymon and Riss demonstration // J. exp, Psychol. 1940. Vol. 26.

136.Gibson JJ< A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology // PsychoL Bull, 1941. VoL 38.

137.Gibson JJ. Perception of visual world, N.Y., 1930.

138.HaberRM Nature of the effect of set on perception // Psychol. Rev.l966.Vol.73.No4,

139.Hall C£, Undzey a Theories of personality. NX, 1970,

140.Hebb D.O* The organization of behavior. A, Neuropsychological theory, N.Y., 1949.

141.fferzog ILL., Unruch W*H Toward a unification of Usnadze theory of set and Western theories of human functioning // Psychological Investigations, Tbilisi, 1973.

142.Hritmk /, Janzen НЛ A comparison of Ustanovka and Einsteliung: Usnadze und Luchins // Prangishvily A.S. (Ed.)- Psychological Investigations, Tbilisi, 1973.

143.Humphrey G. Thinking, NX, 1963.