47.    Heim E. Coping und Adaptivitat: Gibt es geeignetes oder ungeeignetes Coping, Psychother., Psychosom., med. Psychol. – 1988. -№ 1. – р. 8 – 17.

48.    Lazarus R. S. and Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping // European journal of personality. 1987. 1. P. 141-169.

49.    Lazarus R. S. and Launier R. Stress-Related Transactions between Person and Environment // L. A. Pervin, M. Lewis (eds). Perspective in International Psychology N. Y: Plenum, 1978. P. 287-327.

50.    Lazarus R. S. Fifty years of research and theory of R. S. Lazarus (An analyses of historical and perennial issues). New York, 1998.

51.    Lazarus R. S. Progress on a cognitive motivational-relational theory of emotions // American Psychologist. 1991. V. 46. P. 819-837.

52.    Lazarus R. S. Psychological stress and the coping process // Me-Graw Hill, № 4, 1996. – 29 р.

53.    Lazarus R. S., Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. – N. Y., 1984. – 218 p.

54.    Murphy L. Coping vulnerability and residence in childhood – coping and adaptation. – N. Y., 1974.

55.    Murphy L. B. The widening world of childhood. New York Basic Books, 1962.

56.    Murphy L. B., Moriarity A. Vulnerability, Coping and Growth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976. – P. 223.

57.    Nacano К. Coping strategies and psychological Symptoms in Japanese Samples // J. clin. Psychol. – 1991. – V. 47. – № 3. – P. 346 – 350.

58.    Nakano K. The role of coping strategies on psychological and physical well-being // J. of Psychol. Res. l991a. V. 33. № 4. P. 160-167.

59.    Plutchik R., Conte H. R. Circumflex Models of Personality and Emotions: Edited by R. Plutchik and H. . Conte. 1997. 484 p.